International Relations

Agents structures & international relations by Colin Wight

By Colin Wight

The agent-structure challenge is a miles mentioned factor within the box of diplomacy. In his finished research of this challenge, Colin Wight deconstructs the bills of constitution and organization embedded inside of differing IR theories and, at the foundation of this research, explores the consequences of ontology - the metaphysical research of lifestyles and truth. Wight argues that there are lots of gaps in IR thought which can purely be understood by means of concentrating on the ontological variations that build the theoretical panorama. by way of integrating the therapy of the agent-structure challenge in IR idea with that during social idea, Wight makes a good contribution to the matter as a subject of outrage to the broader human sciences. on the so much basic point politics is anxious with competing visions of the way the area is and the way it's going to be, therefore politics is ontology.

Show description

Read or Download Agents structures & international relations PDF

Similar international relations books

Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War

4 accepted causes have traditionally led states to start up battle: worry, curiosity, status and revenge. utilizing an unique dataset, Richard Ned Lebow examines the distribution of wars throughout 3 and a part centuries and argues that, opposite to standard knowledge, just a minority of those have been inspired through defense or fabric curiosity.

Toward a livable world: Leo Szilard and the crusade for nuclear arms control

Leo Szilard conceived of the opportunity of nuclear fission sustained by way of a series response years prior to it used to be completed within the laboratory. He was once additionally one of many initiators of the atomic bomb undertaking within the usa. but he committed his ultimate years to the explanations of figuring out and maintaining existence.

How We Fight: Ethics in War

How We struggle: Ethics in struggle offers a considerable physique of latest paintings through many of the top philosophers of battle. the 10 essays hide a number of themes serious about either jus advert bellum (the morality of going to battle) and jus in bello (the morality of struggling with in war). along explorations of vintage in bello issues, comparable to the main of non-combatant immunity and the distribution of possibility among opponents and non-combatants, the quantity additionally addresses advert bellum issues, similar to pacifism and punitive justifications for struggle, and explores the connection among advert bellum and in bello subject matters, or how the battling of a battle may perhaps have an effect on our judgments referring to no matter if that conflict meets the advert bellum stipulations.

Additional resources for Agents structures & international relations

Sample text

26 IR: a science without positivism? the twentieth-century fascination with linguistics. As should be clear the first is simply mistaken. Positivism has always been an anti-realist philosophical position. 53 When positivists overtly espouse realism it is at best an empirical realism as opposed to the depth realism enunciated by scientific realism. 54 Even contemporary postmodern sceptics wish us to take their pronouncements as ‘real’. 55 Referential detachment establishes the difference between the reference and that to which is being referred, as well as the possibility of another reference to it; which is a condition of possibility for intelligible discourse about any form of object.

Thus the philosophical assumptions that underpin positivism play a fundamental role in the account of cause that is accepted. From an antirealist perspective, there is simply no warrant, given that existence is a function of being experienced, for the belief in non-observable causal mechanisms. Rejecting these deep philosophical assumptions can lead 34 Also according to Hume, since experience could not be divorced from a subject which experiences, he concluded that the ‘science of man is the only solid foundation for the other sciences’ and the basis of this science of man can only be that of experience and observation.

For an explanation of the similarities see Patom¨aki and Wight (2000). 21 It is not possible here to document fully the breadth and depth of the attacks on the positivist orthodoxy. However, a good survey of this literature can be found in Oldroyd (1986). See also Chalmers (1992). 22 George (1994) comes close to adopting this tone. 23 Wendt (1999: 90). This is even the case in those instances where authors explicitly deny it. Chernoff (2002), for example, attempts to refute the role of this commitment to philosophical realism, but his critique only makes sense if we conclude that the explanations he does provide tell us something that we did not previously know.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 49 votes