By Dr Maartje Abbenhuis
An Age of Neutrals offers a pioneering background of neutrality in Europe and the broader global among the Congress of Vienna and the outbreak of the 1st global battle. The 'long' 19th century (1815-1914) used to be an period of remarkable industrialization, imperialism and globalization; one that witnessed Europe's financial and political hegemony the world over. Dr Maartje Abbenhuis explores the ways that neutrality bolstered those interconnected advancements. She argues passive notion of neutrality has to this point avoided historians from knowing the excessive regard with which neutrality, as a device of international relations and statecraft and as a well-liked excellent with various functions, used to be held. This compelling new background exposes neutrality as a colourful and crucial a part of the nineteenth-century overseas method; a strong device utilized by nice and small powers to unravel disputes, stabilize diplomacy and advertise quite a few pursuits inside of and outdoors the continent.
Read or Download An Age of Neutrals: Great Power Politics, 1815-1914 PDF
Similar political history books
The 1st of 3 volumes of essays through Quentin Skinner, one of many world's best highbrow historians. This assortment comprises a few of his most vital philosophical and methodological statements written over the last 4 a long time, every one conscientiously revised for ebook during this shape. In a sequence of seminal essays Professor Skinner units forth the highbrow ideas that tell his paintings.
Pierre Bayle's Dictionnaire Historique et Critique used to be a bestseller all through Europe for 2 centuries. Sally L. Jenkinson's masterly new version provides the reader with a coherent course via Bayle's big paintings, uncovering Bayle's revolutionary perspectives on toleration and elitism. This anthology is the 1st in English to offer Bayle as a in particular political philosopher.
Greater than the other unmarried philosopher, William of Ockham (c. 1285-1347) is answerable for the commonly held glossy assumption that non secular and secular-political associations may still function independently of each other. His aspect of departure used to be a sad collision among particularly Christian beliefs: that of St.
'Myths of Europe' specializes in the identification of Europe, trying to re-examine its cultural, literary and political traditions within the context of the twenty first century. Over 20 authors - historians, political scientists, literary students, paintings and cultural historians - from 5 nations the following input right into a debate.
- Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past
- Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party 1689-1720
- Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations
- Metascience and Politics: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Language of Political Science
Additional info for An Age of Neutrals: Great Power Politics, 1815-1914
Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 158–209. M. Lyons, Post-revolutionary Europe 1815–1856. Houndsmills, Palgrave MacMillan, 2006, esp. pp. 1–21. Schroeder, Transformation, pp. 579–80, 586–93. 4 There is, therefore, much to be said for Schroeder’s argument that the Congress of Vienna was one of the most successful peace settlements of all time. For while the European states initiated and were involved in numerous wars and conflicts around the globe between 1815 and 1914, at no stage did any of these conflagrations turn into a Europe-wide affair.
18 However, these years of war also witnessed a change in the understanding of state behaviour. Hugo Grotius was one of the first legal theoreticians to allow for neutrality, but only when there was a ‘just’ cause on both belligerent sides. 20 These principles formed the foundation of international legal expectations relating to neutral conduct in time of war from this point on, even if in practice the principles were infrequently enacted or exacted. 21 As a result, neutrality was freed from its moral and religious shackles and became a serious option to be pursued in time of war.
It is also an extraordinarily fragile and controversial foreign policy because it comes into play in time of war. Obviously, a neutral state could only survive a war as a neutral when the belligerents respected its non-belligerency. As the Swedish King Gustavus Adolphus was said to have uttered about the matter during the Thirty Years War (1618–48): ‘But what is neutrality? I don’t understand it. ’1 For the king, neutrality did not exist because he chose for it to have no meaning – either his neighbours were with him or they were against him, in which case they became his enemies.